Researcher illegally shares millions of science papers free online to spread knowledge
A researcher in Russia has made more than 48 million journal articles – almost every single peer-reviewed paper every published – freely available online. And she’s now refusing to shut the site down, despite a court injunction and a lawsuit from Elsevier, one of the world’s biggest publishers.
For those of you who aren’t already using it, the site in question is Sci-Hub, and it’s sort of like a Pirate Bay of the science world. It was established in 2011 by neuroscientist Alexandra Elbakyan, who was frustrated that she couldn’t afford to access the articles needed for her research, and it’s since gone viral, with hundreds of thousands of papers being downloaded daily. But at the end of last year, the site was ordered to be taken down by a New York district court – a ruling that Elbakyan has decided to fight, triggering a debate over who really owns science.
“Payment of $32 is just insane when you need to skim or read tens or hundreds of these papers to do research. I obtained these papers by pirating them,”Elbakyan told Torrent Freak last year. “Everyone should have access to knowledge regardless of their income or affiliation. And that’s absolutely legal.”
If it sounds like a modern day Robin Hood struggle, that’s because it kinda is. But in this story, it’s not just the poor who don’t have access to scientific papers – journal subscriptions have become so expensive that leading universities such as Harvard and Cornell have admitted they can no longer afford them. Researchers have also taken a stand – with 15,000 scientists vowing to boycott publisher Elsevier in part for its excessive paywall fees.
In case you don’t feel like going through the entire article, here are some important points:
- Researcher in Russia thinks it’s stupid to pay so much for articles
- makes own site with pirated articles
- it really is hella expensive to read articles
- Big publishers are rlly mad
- they brought up a lawsuit
- The researchers don’t actually get any of the money from the fees required to read the article
- Also the publishers have questionable processes that promote rapid publication that could easily result in misinformation
- It’s unlikely that the lawsuit will result in money even if the company wins
- but the suit has implications for the accessibility of information and the role of large corporations in restricting access to articles
To reiterate: Researchers get NO money from articles they publish. Neither do the people who provide peer review to help avoid shitty research being published. The publishers are charging $30+ each (sometimes for 24hrs access, not even a version you can save/print) plus the millions they get from libraries for their “value added” like layout, formatting, and server space.
Further highlights (emphasis mine):
[E]xperts are predicting will win Elsevier around $750 to $150,000 for each pirated article. Even at the lowest estimations, that would quickly add up to millions in damages.
Takin’ no shit:
“I think Elsevier’s business model is itself illegal,” she told Torrent Freak, referring to article 27 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, which states that "everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits"….
“If Elsevier manages to shut down our projects or force them into the darknet, that will demonstrate an important idea: that the public does not have the right to knowledge,” she said.
Summary: Alexandra Elbakyan for queen of science!