aeternalegacy:

sacrastic-fantastic:

uglyemo:

image
image
image

please read this

Lmaoooo what a sweet journey

This is so sweet… and yet really painful. Like, how strong is the heteronormativity ingrained in this poor guy that he insists he’s straight even after all that? But at least it had a happy ending 🙂

rannulfr:

skysinger-musings:

thanks-for-the-scarf:

gojiro:

Fun Vampire Fact; the reason that Vampires traditionally cannot see their reflections in a mirror is because mirrors used to be backed with a reflective layer of silver — which, as the metal of purity, would not ‘interact’ with Vampires, who are the Devil’s work.

However, modern mirrors have used aluminum as their reflective backing for many years now — and aluminum is not a ‘picky’ metal at all. So Vampires are able to see their reflections in modern mirrors.

All I can think about is a vampire used to not seeing their reflection in mirrors for centuries, and one day they are just walking along and unknowingly pass a mirror backed with aluminum and THEY NEARLY SHIT THEMSELVES.

There are no Nosferatu, just pretty vamps who hadn’t exfoliated in 2 centuries.

peristeronicsuperhero:

trainthief:

me, circa early 1800s, paying a stable boy a few coppers to ride overnight to deliver you an urgent letter with a thick wax seal that after you struggle to break it just says “bitch!” in tiny little writing 

no no no, you don’t understand the true level of spiteful here. The sender of a letter didn’t pay for the post in 1800. The receiver did. You just made your enemy pay for the privilege of being insulted.

tiger-in-the-flightdeck:

smallest-feeblest-boggart:

amuseoffyre:

nerdyblogname:

shesafunnyshoney:

pettybitchcatullus:

foxhounders:

ppl who dont even like shakespeare: WOW how DARE you alter the original text these are CLASSICS have you no RESPECT, going around DESECRATING these sacred texts in the name of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS!!!!!!!!!

people who love shakespeare: im going to stage a production of hamlet where all the actors are dogs

it’s what he would have wanted 

Okay so the universal law of Shakespeare, as I’ve heard it, is that you can take things out, you can rearrange them, you just cannot add anything in that conflicts with the original texts. So while you cannot have a production of romeo and juliet where the houses get along and they get married, it’s perfectly acceptable to replace all the actors with dogs in hamlet because the characters are never outright stated to not be dogs.

“The characters are never outright stated not to be dogs”

“It was never a part of their journey” but better.

Things I have seen:

  • Hamlet set in a psychiatric institution where it was heavily implied the whole thing was his imagination
  • Romeo and Juliet where the Montagues were aliens
  • Steampunk Hungarian Romeo and Juliet musical with a fleet of rapping white boys
  • Russian King Lear which was the bleakest thing I have ever seen
  • Richard III set in the 1930s including fascist iconography
  • The Tempest in Space
  • Meiji Era Twelfth Night set in a Kabuki theatre in a fascinating meta examination of the role of women and men who play women (being performed entirely by a company of women)
  • Romeo & Juliet, Merchant of Venice, Measure for Measure and Hamlet each with a single very drunk performer.

I love seeing what different productions bring to the table, because it’s so much fun! It’s also fun to watch Shakespeare purists pitch a fit about it being wrong. Bitch, stfu. I know for a fact that when Shakespeare’s globe burned down, one of the drunken audience members put out his burning trousers with his pint. This was not high-brow sober art. This was for the people and they loved it.

fun fact, i played the prince in a high school production of The Tempest and looking back it so easily could have been set in space

I was once in a film noir gangster style version of Romeo and Juliet. Where I played Romeo in a pinstripe suit and a fedora.